Prismata Wiki:Admin noticeboard

The Admin noticeboard is one way through which users can notify of issues needing administrative attention. While users are welcome to directly contact specific administrators (especially if they are seen to be active), posting here can be an easier and quicker way of ensuring that at least one admin will notice an issue and respond to it promptly. Remember to sign (using four tildes: ) when posting an issue.

Before posting an issue here, please consider the following:
 * This page is for reporting wiki issues. Please post discussions on the talk page.
 * Post only issues that require administrative action, i.e. blocking vandals, protecting pages, restoring deleted pages etc.
 * Do not post deletion requests here. Deletion requests should be made by adding reason for deletion request to the top of the target page, which will then automatically mark the page as a candidate for deletion.
 * Do not post issues regarding content disputes. Try making a request for comment instead.
 * Mediation requests between users should only be made once a resolution could not be reached between users.
 * For issues regarding the use of this wiki, please see our help center.

In case of vandalism, posting about it here is low priority. Revert it first, anyone can do so. If the vandal created a new page, tag it for deletion. Assume good faith and consider leaving a message on that user's talk page to explain the reason. Post here only if the user has made several disruptive edits and/or persists despite a warning. Always avoid a revert war with the vandal; it is far better to wait until an admin has a chance to intervene. If a user must be reported here, please use user, preferably as the topic subject/headline.

[ Please post new topics at the bottom of the page by clicking this link to add a new section.]

Current Issues
Despite having done multiple cash clearings, the Self-sacrifice page is still outdated as it does not show Photonic Fibroid even though I made its "sacrificable" parameter equal to "yes" in the Data:Units/Photonic Fibroid page. Also, the infopanel File:Photonic_Fibroid-panel.png is outdated as it shows Photonic Fibroid is fragile, which is currently not true.

MindcraftMax (talk) 13:16, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed Self-sacrifice page. "sacrificable" was still showing up as "no" in Special:CargoTables/Units, so I did a null edit to Photonic Fibroid. Then a null edit to Self-sacrifice resulted in it showing up there.
 * As for the panel, I think we're mainly waiting for Lunarch to update their public asset (which still shows Fragile at this time) so we can copy it to here. It has been mentioned to them previously. --Rezyk (talk) 15:46, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The user 181.73.201.22 has been making edits lately containing horribly inaccurate information. Besides making broad, sweeping claims that are just completely inaccurate (like https://prismata.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Ossified_Drone&diff=prev&oldid=12236), they have posted openings that are literally illegal, such as in the recent edits to Lucina Spinos, made blantant unqualified claims about player advantage (such as in https://prismata.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Hellhound&diff=prev&oldid=12202), and my efforts to contact them about it have been entirely unsuccessful. I think this user is SSP. One way or another they need to be stopped.

Yujiri (talk) 22:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC)Yujiri
 * Apologies for the delay. I must have somehow missed the notification for this. I've given the user a one-week block for now. OOeyes (talk) 22:23, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

User Zerarch77
This user vandalized the Thunderhead page, arguably on "bad faith". https://prismata.gamepedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/12877 He deleted a section off of strategy, for one. Please adress the issue. Revert edit button not seen. I expect that the User will do such again in other pages recently edited, as he did now.
 * Unless bad faith is blatantly obvious, it's standard wiki practice to assume good faith, and other than the content removal, I don't see anything in this edit or subsequent edits to assume intentional vandalism. That suggests Zerarch77 may have legitimately thought the content merited removal, so, at this stage, it is more appropriate to try to discuss the matter with him than seek admin intervention. As for reverting and looking up removed content, that's usually done from the history. In this case, I chose not to revert, but to copy the removed content out of the old revision back on the page because I haven't been given reason yet to believe the rest of the edit is in dispute. OOeyes (talk) 23:03, 12 October 2019 (UTC)